5 # - Preventing Diabetic Foot Ulcer Recurrence in high risk patients 0 of 25 questions answered 5 # - Are appropriate definitions included for the terms “ulcer”, “healing”, and all other required aspects of the population and the outcomes? 5 # - Are appropriate definitions included for the terms “ulcer”, “healing”, and all other required aspects of the population and the outcomes? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 6 # - Was the choice of study population appropriate for the chosen intervention and the stated conclusions? 6 # - Was the choice of study population appropriate for the chosen intervention and the stated conclusions? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 7 # - Was there a control population that was managed at the same time as those in the intervention group or groups? 7 # - Was there a control population that was managed at the same time as those in the intervention group or groups? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 8 # - Is the intervention sufficiently well described to enable another researcher to replicate the study? 8 # - Is the intervention sufficiently well described to enable another researcher to replicate the study? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 9 # - Are the components of other aspects of care described for the intervention and comparator groups? 9 # - Are the components of other aspects of care described for the intervention and comparator groups? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 10 # - Were the participants randomised into intervention and comparator groups? 10 # - Were the participants randomised into intervention and comparator groups? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 11 # - Were the participants randomised by an independent person or agency? 11 # - Were the participants randomised by an independent person or agency? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 12 # - Was the number of participants studied in the trial based on an appropriate sample size calculation? 12 # - Was the number of participants studied in the trial based on an appropriate sample size calculation? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 13 # - Was the chosen primary outcome of direct clinical relevance? 13 # - Was the chosen primary outcome of direct clinical relevance? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 14 # - Was the person who assessed the primary outcome or outcomes blinded to group allocation? 14 # - Was the person who assessed the primary outcome or outcomes blinded to group allocation? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 15 # - Were the clinical researcher who cared for the wound at research visits and the participants blinded to group allocation? 15 # - Were the clinical researcher who cared for the wound at research visits and the participants blinded to group allocation? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 16 # - Did the study complete recruitment? 16 # - Did the study complete recruitment? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 17 # - Was it possible to document the primary outcome in 75% or more of those recruited? 17 # - Was it possible to document the primary outcome in 75% or more of those recruited? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 18 # - Were the results analysed primarily by intention-to-treat analysis? 18 # - Were the results analysed primarily by intention-to-treat analysis? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 19 # - Were appropriate statistical methods used throughout? 19 # - Were appropriate statistical methods used throughout? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 20 # - Was the performance in the control group of the order that would be expected in routine clinical practice? 20 # - Was the performance in the control group of the order that would be expected in routine clinical practice? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 21 # - Are the results from all participating centres comparable? Answer “yes” if the study was done in only one centre 21 # - Are the results from all participating centres comparable? Answer “yes” if the study was done in only one centre Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 22 # - Is the report free from errors of reporting—eg, discrepancies between data reported in different parts of the report? 22 # - Is the report free from errors of reporting—eg, discrepancies between data reported in different parts of the report? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 23 # - Are the important strengths and weaknesses of the study discussed in a balanced way? 23 # - Are the important strengths and weaknesses of the study discussed in a balanced way? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 24 # - Are the conclusions supported by the findings? 24 # - Are the conclusions supported by the findings? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... 25 # - Is the report free from any suggestion that the analysis or the conclusions could have been substantially influenced by people with commercial or other personal interests in the findings? 25 # - Is the report free from any suggestion that the analysis or the conclusions could have been substantially influenced by people with commercial or other personal interests in the findings? Yes (+) No (-) Unclear (?) Add a note... Save Submit
